<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another lovely example of type class morphisms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://conal.net/blog/posts/another-lovely-example-of-type-class-morphisms/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://conal.net/blog/posts/another-lovely-example-of-type-class-morphisms</link>
	<description>Inspirations &#38; experiments, mainly about denotative/functional programming in Haskell</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2020 21:06:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.17</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conal Elliott &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Enhancing a Zip</title>
		<link>http://conal.net/blog/posts/another-lovely-example-of-type-class-morphisms#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Conal Elliott &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Enhancing a Zip]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 01:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conal.net/blog/?p=58#comment-192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Part One related Max&#8217;s data representation of left folds to type class morphisms, a pattern that&#8217;s been steering me lately toward natural (inevitable) design of libraries. Part Two simplified that representation to help get to the essence of zipping, and in doing so lost the expressiveness necessary to define Functorand Applicative instaces. Part Three proved the suitability of the zipping definitions in Part Two. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Part One related Max&#8217;s data representation of left folds to type class morphisms, a pattern that&#8217;s been steering me lately toward natural (inevitable) design of libraries. Part Two simplified that representation to help get to the essence of zipping, and in doing so lost the expressiveness necessary to define Functorand Applicative instaces. Part Three proved the suitability of the zipping definitions in Part Two. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conal Elliott &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More beautiful fold zipping</title>
		<link>http://conal.net/blog/posts/another-lovely-example-of-type-class-morphisms#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Conal Elliott &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More beautiful fold zipping]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 21:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conal.net/blog/?p=58#comment-191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] About      &#171; Another lovely example of type class morphisms [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] About      &laquo; Another lovely example of type class morphisms [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
