http://conal.net/blog/posts/composable-parallel-scanning Inspirations & experiments, mainly about denotative/functional programming in Haskell Sat, 26 Sep 2020 21:06:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.17 http://conal.net/blog/posts/composable-parallel-scanning#comment-832 Sat, 28 May 2011 00:39:27 +0000 http://conal.net/blog/?p=411#comment-832 Twan: Yes. I was thinking of using mapAccumL and mapAccumR to define prefixScan and suffixScan as specifications. I wouldn’t want the resulting implementations, since they’re sequential, not parallel.

]]> http://conal.net/blog/posts/composable-parallel-scanning#comment-831 Fri, 27 May 2011 07:58:25 +0000 http://conal.net/blog/?p=411#comment-831 You could implement prefixScan and suffixScan using mapAccumL and mapAccumR from Data.Traversable. Since Ghc can also derive Traversable, this way you need no extra manually written code for each data type.

]]> http://conal.net/blog/posts/composable-parallel-scanning#comment-830 Tue, 24 May 2011 20:31:29 +0000 http://conal.net/blog/?p=411#comment-830 […] About « Composable parallel scanning […]

]]> http://conal.net/blog/posts/composable-parallel-scanning#comment-829 Sat, 05 Mar 2011 19:57:44 +0000 http://conal.net/blog/?p=411#comment-829 Thanks, Jade. I’ve eliminated that final sentence fragment.

]]> http://conal.net/blog/posts/composable-parallel-scanning#comment-828 Wed, 02 Mar 2011 22:55:11 +0000 http://conal.net/blog/?p=411#comment-828 Your post seems to end mid-sentence (unless it is just very dry humour!).

]]>