Comments on: Why classic FRP does not fit interactive behavior

By: Peter Verswyvelen

Peter Verswyvelen — Wed, 31 Dec 2014 23:32:00 +0000

Maybe the key is to model FRP in 4D Minkowski space, using general relativity

By: Axiomatic basis for FRP « Enough Blogging!

Axiomatic basis for FRP « Enough Blogging! — Wed, 09 Jun 2010 22:39:32 +0000

[...] T is an ordered, measurable set, usually denoting time. This is what Conal Elliott called an “interactive behavior“, and what is known in Yampa as a “signal function”. I use the term [...]

By: Conal Elliott » Blog Archive » Garbage collecting the semantics of FRP

Conal Elliott » Blog Archive » Garbage collecting the semantics of FRP — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:55:34 +0000

[...] (e.g., Haskell) functions between behaviors. Problems with this formulation are described in Why classic FRP does not fit interactive behavior. These same problems motivated “Arrowized FRP”. In Arrowized FRP, behaviors (renamed [...]

By: okie

okie — Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:48:56 +0000

This discussion of slightly different views of the behavior of systems involves trade offs between time, information, and certainty. It's interesting how transformations that modulate the trade offs can combine and to redistribute them. In terms of the information theoretic fundamental quantities, everything is always conserved, but particular applications can sure as hell see some amazing benefits. As far as convenient and efficient packaging without losing expressiveness or semantic accuracy go, I think there's spooky usefulness in wavelet analysis...but maybe it's just similar to how I think about things.

By: Conal Elliott » Blog Archive » Functional interactive behavior

Conal Elliott » Blog Archive » Functional interactive behavior — Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:26:55 +0000

[...] a previous post, I presented a fundamental reason why classic FRP does not fit interactive behavior, which is that the semantic model captures only the influence of time and not other input. I also [...]

By: Luke Palmer

Luke Palmer — Wed, 10 Dec 2008 07:58:11 +0000

I love the exposition of the conjugate transformation of interactive behaviors. I can't wait for the next installment!